e2bvsnocodb
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| e2b | nocodb | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms |
| GitHub stars | 14 597 | 65 374 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +659 | +320 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 | 15 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
nocodb scores 81/100 against 76/100 for e2b, so it is the safer default.
e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for nocodb.
e2b is growing faster right now (+659 stars in 30 days).