e2bvsnext-ai-draw-io
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| e2b | next-ai-draw-io | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 12 in Diagramming |
| GitHub stars | 14 596 | 36 466 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +658 | +440 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 | 11 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.5.0 · 10 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
next-ai-draw-io scores 79/100 against 76/100 for e2b, so it is the safer default.
e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for next-ai-draw-io.
If you want the quickest setup, next-ai-draw-io is easier to run; e2b needs more configuration.
e2b details →next-ai-draw-io details →