# e2b vs Navidrome Music Server

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | e2b | Navidrome Music Server |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 14 595 | 24 413 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +657 ✓ | +655 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 ✓ | 15 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.64.2 · 23 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Navidrome Music Server scores 80/100 against 76/100 for e2b, so it is the safer default.

e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for Navidrome Music Server.

If you want the quickest setup, Navidrome Music Server is easier to run; e2b needs more configuration.

## Details

- [e2b](https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b.md)
- [Navidrome Music Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/navidrome-music-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/navidrome-music-server.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/e2b-vs-navidrome-music-server