# e2b vs multica

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | e2b | multica |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 84/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #15 of 209 in AI Agents | #10 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 14 602 | 54 174 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +644 | +2 866 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 | 87 ✓ |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

multica scores 84/100 against 76/100 for e2b, so it is the safer default.

multica ships more often: 87 stable releases in the past year, against 76 for e2b.

multica is growing faster right now (+2 866 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [e2b](https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b.md)
- [multica](https://selfhost.directory/project/multica) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/multica.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/e2b-vs-multica