e2bvsmultica
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| e2b | multica | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 84/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 209 in AI Agents | #10 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 14 600 | 54 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +642 | +2 850 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 | 87 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
multica scores 84/100 against 76/100 for e2b, so it is the safer default.
multica ships more often: 87 stable releases in the past year, against 76 for e2b.
multica is growing faster right now (+2 850 stars in 30 days).
e2b details →multica details →