e2bvsMQTTX Web
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| e2b | MQTTX Web | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 10 in IoT |
| GitHub stars | 14 595 | 5 086 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +657 | +22 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 | 3 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.13.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
e2b scores 76/100 against 67/100 for MQTTX Web, so it is the safer default.
e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for MQTTX Web.
If you want the quickest setup, MQTTX Web is easier to run; e2b needs more configuration.
e2b is growing faster right now (+657 stars in 30 days).
e2b details →MQTTX Web details →