# e2b vs mitmproxy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | e2b | mitmproxy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 14 597 | 46 462 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +659 | +1 327 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 76/100 for e2b, so it is the safer default.

e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.

mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 327 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [e2b](https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/e2b.md)
- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/e2b-vs-mitmproxy