e2bvsmilvus
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| e2b | milvus | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 595 | 46 513 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +657 | +270 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 | 18 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 | v2.6.26 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
milvus scores 82/100 against 76/100 for e2b, so it is the safer default.
e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for milvus.
If you want the quickest setup, e2b is easier to run; milvus needs more configuration.
e2b is growing faster right now (+657 stars in 30 days).