# duragraph vs WOML

> Two self-hosted [Temporal alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/temporal), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | duragraph | WOML |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 46/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 7 in AI Workflows | #21 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 161 ✓ | 156 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +25 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v0.8.1 · 10 Sept 2026 | v1.1.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

WOML scores 46/100 against 43/100 for duragraph, so it is the safer default.

duragraph ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for WOML.

WOML is growing faster right now (+25 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [duragraph](https://selfhost.directory/project/duragraph) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/duragraph.md)
- [WOML](https://selfhost.directory/project/woml) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woml.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/duragraph-vs-woml