# Duplicati vs Telegram-Archive

> Two self-hosted [Backup projects](https://selfhost.directory/backup), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Duplicati | Telegram-Archive |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 46 in Backup | #31 of 46 in Backup |
| GitHub stars | 15 172 ✓ | 233 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +150 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 27 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.4.0.1_stable_2026-10-07 · 7 Oct 2026 | v9.5.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C# | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Duplicati scores 75/100 against 51/100 for Telegram-Archive, so it is the safer default.

Telegram-Archive ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Duplicati.

If you want the quickest setup, Duplicati is easier to run; Telegram-Archive needs more configuration.

Duplicati is growing faster right now (+150 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Duplicati](https://selfhost.directory/project/duplicati) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/duplicati.md)
- [Telegram-Archive](https://selfhost.directory/project/telegram-archive) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/telegram-archive.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/duplicati-vs-telegram-archive