# Duplicati vs repliqate

> Two self-hosted [Backup projects](https://selfhost.directory/backup), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Duplicati | repliqate |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 46 in Backup | #40 of 46 in Backup |
| GitHub stars | 15 172 ✓ | 242 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +152 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v2.4.0.1_stable_2026-10-07 · 7 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.2.4 · 14 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C# | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Duplicati scores 76/100 against 42/100 for repliqate, so it is the safer default.

Duplicati ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for repliqate.

If you want the quickest setup, Duplicati is easier to run; repliqate needs more configuration.

Duplicati is growing faster right now (+152 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Duplicati](https://selfhost.directory/project/duplicati) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/duplicati.md)
- [repliqate](https://selfhost.directory/project/repliqate) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/repliqate.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/duplicati-vs-repliqate