# Dufs vs wyoming-piper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Dufs | wyoming-piper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #7 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 10 998 ✓ | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +49 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.5.2 · 11 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Dufs scores 72/100 against 52/100 for wyoming-piper, so it is the safer default.

wyoming-piper ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Dufs.

If you want the quickest setup, Dufs is easier to run; wyoming-piper needs more configuration.

Dufs is growing faster right now (+49 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Dufs](https://selfhost.directory/project/dufs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dufs.md)
- [wyoming-piper](https://selfhost.directory/project/wyoming-piper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wyoming-piper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dufs-vs-wyoming-piper