DufsvsWinter CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Dufs | Winter CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #16 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 997 | 1 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +48 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 7 |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v1.2.14 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Dufs scores 72/100 against 62/100 for Winter CMS, so it is the safer default.
Winter CMS ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Dufs.
If you want the quickest setup, Dufs is easier to run; Winter CMS needs more configuration.
Dufs is growing faster right now (+48 stars in 30 days).
Dufs details →Winter CMS details →
Swap a project
Keep Dufs, compare it with
Keep Winter CMS, compare it with