Dufsvswindmill
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Dufs | windmill | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #6 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 10 995 | 18 307 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +46 | +287 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 162 |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v1.852.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Rust | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
windmill scores 77/100 against 72/100 for Dufs, so it is the safer default.
windmill ships more often: 162 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Dufs.
If you want the quickest setup, Dufs is easier to run; windmill needs more configuration.
windmill is growing faster right now (+287 stars in 30 days).
Dufs details →windmill details →
Swap a project
Keep Dufs, compare it with
Keep windmill, compare it with