Dufsvswanderer
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Dufs | wanderer | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #7 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 995 | 4 031 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +46 | +132 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v0.21.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Dufs scores 72/100 against 64/100 for wanderer, so it is the safer default.
wanderer ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Dufs.
If you want the quickest setup, Dufs is easier to run; wanderer needs more configuration.
wanderer is growing faster right now (+132 stars in 30 days).
Dufs details →wanderer details →
Swap a project
Keep Dufs, compare it with
Keep wanderer, compare it with