DufsvsWakupator
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Dufs | Wakupator | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #11 of 22 in Home Server |
| GitHub stars | 10 998 | 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +49 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 1 |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v1.2.0 · 6 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | C |
Which one should you pick?
Dufs scores 72/100 against 43/100 for Wakupator, so it is the safer default.
Dufs ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Wakupator.
If you want the quickest setup, Dufs is easier to run; Wakupator needs more configuration.
Dufs is growing faster right now (+49 stars in 30 days).
Dufs details →Wakupator details →
Swap a project
Keep Dufs, compare it with
Keep Wakupator, compare it with