# Dufs vs unopim

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Dufs | unopim |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #1 of 6 in Product Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 998 | 11 045 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +49 ✓ | +46 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.1.3 · 29 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Dufs scores 72/100 against 69/100 for unopim, so it is the safer default.

unopim ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Dufs.

If you want the quickest setup, Dufs is easier to run; unopim needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Dufs](https://selfhost.directory/project/dufs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dufs.md)
- [unopim](https://selfhost.directory/project/unopim) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unopim.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dufs-vs-unopim