# Dufs vs uncompressed

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Dufs | uncompressed |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #71 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 10 998 ✓ | 213 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +49 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.0.0 · 4 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Dufs scores 72/100 against 47/100 for uncompressed, so it is the safer default.

Dufs ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for uncompressed.

If you want the quickest setup, Dufs is easier to run; uncompressed needs more configuration.

Dufs is growing faster right now (+49 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Dufs](https://selfhost.directory/project/dufs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dufs.md)
- [uncompressed](https://selfhost.directory/project/uncompressed) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uncompressed.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dufs-vs-uncompressed