# Dufs vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Dufs | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 10 995 | 117 816 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +46 | +5 457 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 72/100 for Dufs, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Dufs.

If you want the quickest setup, Dufs is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Dufs](https://selfhost.directory/project/dufs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dufs.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dufs-vs-tradingagents