DufsvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Dufs | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 10 995 | 117 816 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +46 | +5 457 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 72/100 for Dufs, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Dufs.
If you want the quickest setup, Dufs is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).
Dufs details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep Dufs, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with