# Dufs vs tootik

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Dufs | tootik |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #53 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 10 999 ✓ | 211 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +50 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.25.5 · 3 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Dufs scores 72/100 against 47/100 for tootik, so it is the safer default.

tootik ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Dufs.

If you want the quickest setup, Dufs is easier to run; tootik needs more configuration.

Dufs is growing faster right now (+50 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Dufs](https://selfhost.directory/project/dufs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dufs.md)
- [tootik](https://selfhost.directory/project/tootik) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tootik.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dufs-vs-tootik