DufsvsSpeedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Dufs | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 10 996 | 144 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +47 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Dufs scores 72/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.
Dufs ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.
Dufs is growing faster right now (+47 stars in 30 days).
Dufs details →Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana details →
Swap a project
Keep Dufs, compare it with
Keep Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, compare it with