# Dufs vs SpacetimeDB

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Dufs | SpacetimeDB |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #7 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 10 997 | 25 416 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +48 | +94 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v2.13.0 · 19 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Rust | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

SpacetimeDB scores 75/100 against 72/100 for Dufs, so it is the safer default.

SpacetimeDB ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Dufs.

If you want the quickest setup, Dufs is easier to run; SpacetimeDB needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Dufs](https://selfhost.directory/project/dufs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dufs.md)
- [SpacetimeDB](https://selfhost.directory/project/spacetimedb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/spacetimedb.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dufs-vs-spacetimedb