# Dufs vs solidtime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Dufs | solidtime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #3 of 11 in Time Tracking |
| GitHub stars | 10 998 ✓ | 9 059 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +49 | +131 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 20 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v0.22.1 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Dufs scores 72/100 against 69/100 for solidtime, so it is the safer default.

solidtime ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Dufs.

If you want the quickest setup, Dufs is easier to run; solidtime needs more configuration.

solidtime is growing faster right now (+131 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Dufs](https://selfhost.directory/project/dufs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dufs.md)
- [solidtime](https://selfhost.directory/project/solidtime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/solidtime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dufs-vs-solidtime