Dufsvssolidtime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Dufs | solidtime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #3 of 11 in Time Tracking |
| GitHub stars | 10 998 | 9 059 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +49 | +131 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 20 |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v0.22.1 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Dufs scores 72/100 against 69/100 for solidtime, so it is the safer default.
solidtime ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Dufs.
If you want the quickest setup, Dufs is easier to run; solidtime needs more configuration.
solidtime is growing faster right now (+131 stars in 30 days).
Dufs details →solidtime details →
Swap a project
Keep Dufs, compare it with
Keep solidtime, compare it with