# Dufs vs sidix

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Dufs | sidix |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 31/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #7 of 7 in Local AI |
| GitHub stars | 10 999 ✓ | 25 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +50 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.7.0 · 22 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Dufs scores 72/100 against 31/100 for sidix, so it is the safer default.

Dufs ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for sidix.

If you want the quickest setup, Dufs is easier to run; sidix needs more configuration.

Dufs is growing faster right now (+50 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Dufs](https://selfhost.directory/project/dufs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dufs.md)
- [sidix](https://selfhost.directory/project/sidix) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sidix.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dufs-vs-sidix