DufsvsPulumi
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Dufs | Pulumi | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #1 of 3 in Infrastructure |
| GitHub stars | 10 994 | 25 826 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +45 | +27 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 5 |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v3.272.0 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Pulumi scores 78/100 against 72/100 for Dufs, so it is the safer default.
Pulumi ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Dufs.
If you want the quickest setup, Dufs is easier to run; Pulumi needs more configuration.
Dufs details →Pulumi details →
Swap a project
Keep Dufs, compare it with
Keep Pulumi, compare it with