DufsvsPterodactyl
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Dufs | Pterodactyl | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #5 of 62 in Game Servers |
| GitHub stars | 10 995 | 9 438 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +46 | +184 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v1.15.2 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Rust | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Pterodactyl scores 75/100 against 72/100 for Dufs, so it is the safer default.
Pterodactyl ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Dufs.
If you want the quickest setup, Dufs is easier to run; Pterodactyl needs more configuration.
Pterodactyl is growing faster right now (+184 stars in 30 days).
Dufs details →Pterodactyl details →
Swap a project
Keep Dufs, compare it with
Keep Pterodactyl, compare it with