DufsvsPostHog
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Dufs | PostHog | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #1 of 27 in Analytics |
| GitHub stars | 10 996 | 40 501 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +47 | +582 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 3515 |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | agent-skills-v0.3904.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
PostHog scores 81/100 against 72/100 for Dufs, so it is the safer default.
PostHog ships more often: 3515 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Dufs.
If you want the quickest setup, Dufs is easier to run; PostHog needs more configuration.
PostHog is growing faster right now (+582 stars in 30 days).
Dufs details →PostHog details →
Swap a project
Keep Dufs, compare it with
Keep PostHog, compare it with