Dufsvspaymenter
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Dufs | paymenter | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #3 of 13 in Billing |
| GitHub stars | 10 998 | 2 811 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +49 | +500 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 14 |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v1.5.9 · 2 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Dufs scores 72/100 against 68/100 for paymenter, so it is the safer default.
paymenter ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Dufs.
If you want the quickest setup, Dufs is easier to run; paymenter needs more configuration.
paymenter is growing faster right now (+500 stars in 30 days).
Dufs details →paymenter details →
Swap a project
Keep Dufs, compare it with
Keep paymenter, compare it with