# Dufs vs openwhisk

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Dufs | openwhisk |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #2 of 7 in Serverless |
| GitHub stars | 10 994 ✓ | 6 803 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +45 ✓ | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Scala |

## Which one should you pick?

Dufs scores 72/100 against 67/100 for openwhisk, so it is the safer default.

Dufs ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for openwhisk.

If you want the quickest setup, Dufs is easier to run; openwhisk needs more configuration.

Dufs is growing faster right now (+45 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Dufs](https://selfhost.directory/project/dufs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dufs.md)
- [openwhisk](https://selfhost.directory/project/openwhisk) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openwhisk.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dufs-vs-openwhisk