DufsvsOpenReader
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Dufs | OpenReader | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 994 | 550 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +45 | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 19 |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Dufs scores 72/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.
OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Dufs.
If you want the quickest setup, Dufs is easier to run; OpenReader needs more configuration.
Dufs details →OpenReader details →
Swap a project
Keep Dufs, compare it with
Keep OpenReader, compare it with