# Dufs vs opencut

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Dufs | opencut |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #2 of 12 in Video |
| GitHub stars | 10 997 | 96 748 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +48 | +6 127 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 4 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ | ffmpeg-8.1.3-1 · 24 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

opencut scores 75/100 against 72/100 for Dufs, so it is the safer default.

opencut ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Dufs.

If you want the quickest setup, Dufs is easier to run; opencut needs more configuration.

opencut is growing faster right now (+6 127 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Dufs](https://selfhost.directory/project/dufs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dufs.md)
- [opencut](https://selfhost.directory/project/opencut) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opencut.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dufs-vs-opencut