Dufsvsopencut
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Dufs | opencut | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 86 in File Sharing | #2 of 12 in Video |
| GitHub stars | 10 997 | 96 748 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +48 | +6 127 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 4 |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | ffmpeg-8.1.3-1 · 24 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
opencut scores 75/100 against 72/100 for Dufs, so it is the safer default.
opencut ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Dufs.
If you want the quickest setup, Dufs is easier to run; opencut needs more configuration.
opencut is growing faster right now (+6 127 stars in 30 days).
Dufs details →opencut details →
Swap a project
Keep Dufs, compare it with
Keep opencut, compare it with