# dub-links vs zookeeper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | dub-links | zookeeper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 23 in URL Shortener | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 24 976 ✓ | 12 827 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +161 ✓ | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

dub-links scores 74/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, zookeeper is easier to run; dub-links needs more configuration.

dub-links is growing faster right now (+161 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [dub-links](https://selfhost.directory/project/dub-links) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dub-links.md)
- [zookeeper](https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dub-links-vs-zookeeper