dub-linksvszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| dub-links | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 23 in URL Shortener | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 24 976 | 12 827 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +161 | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
dub-links scores 74/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, zookeeper is easier to run; dub-links needs more configuration.
dub-links is growing faster right now (+161 stars in 30 days).
dub-links details →zookeeper details →