dub-linksvsStash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| dub-links | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 23 in URL Shortener | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 24 979 | 13 308 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +164 | +298 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 7 |
| Latest release | — | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 74/100 for dub-links, so it is the safer default.
Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for dub-links.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; dub-links needs more configuration.
dub-links details →Stash details →