dub-linksvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| dub-links | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 23 in URL Shortener | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 24 979 | 45 021 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +164 | +1 620 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 34 |
| Latest release | — | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 74/100 for dub-links, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for dub-links.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; dub-links needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 620 stars in 30 days).
dub-links details →Reactive Resume details →