# Drupal vs url-to-png

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Drupal | url-to-png |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 42 in Content Management | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | — | 256 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | — | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Drupal scores 71/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.

url-to-png ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Drupal.

If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; Drupal needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Drupal](https://selfhost.directory/project/drupal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/drupal.md)
- [url-to-png](https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/drupal-vs-url-to-png