# Drupal vs unbagrnd

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Drupal | unbagrnd |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 42 in Content Management | #10 of 13 in Image Processing |
| GitHub stars | — | 178 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.5.6 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | — | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Drupal scores 71/100 against 46/100 for unbagrnd, so it is the safer default.

unbagrnd ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Drupal.

If you want the quickest setup, unbagrnd is easier to run; Drupal needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Drupal](https://selfhost.directory/project/drupal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/drupal.md)
- [unbagrnd](https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/drupal-vs-unbagrnd