# drivebase vs OpenReader

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | drivebase | OpenReader |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 59/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #17 of 34 in File Management | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 594 ✓ | 550 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v4.0.0 · 3 Jun 2026 | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenReader scores 59/100 against 51/100 for drivebase, so it is the safer default.

OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for drivebase.

OpenReader is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [drivebase](https://selfhost.directory/project/drivebase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/drivebase.md)
- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/drivebase-vs-openreader