# drivebase vs illa-builder

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | drivebase | illa-builder |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 67/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #17 of 34 in File Management | #3 of 17 in Low Code |
| GitHub stars | 594 | 12 336 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +14 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.0.0 · 3 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

illa-builder scores 67/100 against 51/100 for drivebase, so it is the safer default.

drivebase ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for illa-builder.

If you want the quickest setup, drivebase is easier to run; illa-builder needs more configuration.

illa-builder is growing faster right now (+14 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [drivebase](https://selfhost.directory/project/drivebase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/drivebase.md)
- [illa-builder](https://selfhost.directory/project/illa-builder) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/illa-builder.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/drivebase-vs-illa-builder