# drive vs Orca

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | drive | Orca |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 91/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #19 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #1 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 481 | 109 348 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +9 441 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.25.3 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.4.244 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Orca scores 91/100 against 49/100 for drive, so it is the safer default.

Orca ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for drive.

If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; drive needs more configuration.

Orca is growing faster right now (+9 441 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [drive](https://selfhost.directory/project/drive) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/drive.md)
- [Orca](https://selfhost.directory/project/orca) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/orca.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/drive-vs-orca