# drive vs OpenReader

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | drive | OpenReader |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 59/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #19 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 481 | 550 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +34 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.25.3 · 23 Oct 2026 | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenReader scores 59/100 against 49/100 for drive, so it is the safer default.

OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for drive.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenReader is easier to run; drive needs more configuration.

OpenReader is growing faster right now (+34 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [drive](https://selfhost.directory/project/drive) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/drive.md)
- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/drive-vs-openreader