# drive vs nocodb

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | drive | nocodb |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #19 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms |
| GitHub stars | 481 | 65 379 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +317 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 16 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.25.3 · 23 Oct 2026 | 2026.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

nocodb scores 81/100 against 49/100 for drive, so it is the safer default.

nocodb ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for drive.

If you want the quickest setup, nocodb is easier to run; drive needs more configuration.

nocodb is growing faster right now (+317 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [drive](https://selfhost.directory/project/drive) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/drive.md)
- [nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb.md)

## Related comparisons

- [directus vs nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-nocodb)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/drive-vs-nocodb