# drawdb vs Scada-LTS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | drawdb | Scada-LTS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Diagramming | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 40 160 ✓ | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +469 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

drawdb scores 80/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, drawdb is easier to run; Scada-LTS needs more configuration.

drawdb is growing faster right now (+469 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [drawdb](https://selfhost.directory/project/drawdb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/drawdb.md)
- [Scada-LTS](https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/drawdb-vs-scada-lts