# drawdb vs RustFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | drawdb | RustFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Diagramming | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 40 164 ✓ | 35 514 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +466 | +1 682 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

drawdb scores 80/100 against 74/100 for RustFS, so it is the safer default.

RustFS ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for drawdb.

If you want the quickest setup, drawdb is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.

RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 682 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [drawdb](https://selfhost.directory/project/drawdb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/drawdb.md)
- [RustFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/drawdb-vs-rustfs