# Dozzle vs zookeeper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Dozzle | zookeeper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 13 in Log Management | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 754 ✓ | 12 827 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +289 ✓ | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 43 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v11.3.5 · 24 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Dozzle scores 77/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.

Dozzle ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.

If you want the quickest setup, Dozzle is easier to run; zookeeper needs more configuration.

Dozzle is growing faster right now (+289 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Dozzle](https://selfhost.directory/project/dozzle) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dozzle.md)
- [zookeeper](https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dozzle-vs-zookeeper