# Dozzle vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Dozzle | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 13 in Log Management | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 14 752 ✓ | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +287 ✓ | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 43 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v11.3.5 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.19.0 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Dozzle scores 77/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.

Dozzle ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for woodpecker-ci.

If you want the quickest setup, Dozzle is easier to run; woodpecker-ci needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Dozzle](https://selfhost.directory/project/dozzle) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dozzle.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dozzle-vs-woodpecker-ci