# Dozzle vs temporal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Dozzle | temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 13 in Log Management | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 14 753 | 24 044 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +288 | +784 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 43 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v11.3.5 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 83/100 against 77/100 for Dozzle, so it is the safer default.

Dozzle ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.

If you want the quickest setup, Dozzle is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.

temporal is growing faster right now (+784 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Dozzle](https://selfhost.directory/project/dozzle) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dozzle.md)
- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dozzle-vs-temporal